AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Airtable api create base12/31/2023 ![]() ![]() But without the correct links between entities/types, it has some notable limitations for me. Otherwise trying to keep 25k records in sync is not likely to be feasible, I would think.Īll that said, it’s promising, and probably usable in its current form for some (perhaps many) purposes. I would hope the Airtable API would have some kind of date-based change detection that it could use to limit the transferred data. I’m also wondering whether the sync is change-aware or otherwise incremental, or if it has to fetch all the data from the remote Base to compare against what it has and determine any changes. But it does at least make it much less visually distinguishable vs. I’m not sure whether that’s a necessary limitation long-term nor - more importantly - whether it will cause any issues for the data being referenced/used in other places (e.g. From looking at the Hubspot integration, this seems like generally how it is with integrations to Fibery. Mostly it’s single/multi-selects that appear not to. Checkboxes come in, for example, but single-selects don’t. And in some cases there are multi-relationship, and then you just get a string of comma separated IDs: “reciDkG5eB8SZemYH,recwv81yfeykiCLQU,recLk9CQYlFlgcX4k”Ĭompare to the Hubspot integration where this kind of inter-type linking seems to work fine.Īnother thing is that the field types are not maintained in some cases (but are in others). Main problem is that, in the simplest case where I just created all new Types for Airtable data, the fields that are Relationships just have a record ID instead of an actual connection to the correct other Type/Entity. Can also link to some existing data, though I found that process a little unclear so far. ![]() It does create new Types if you want it to (answering my crossed out question below), so that’s great. Not sure if that’s the issue or what, but I got it to work with a brand new test database with simple test data (CRM, ~50 records). Update: OK so I was trying it with a fairly big production database, 25,000+ records, initially. Please try again later.” I’d try to fix it but I have no idea what the actual problem is from the error message. I’m very excited about this! Unfortunately first result is “Could not load app setting. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |